![]() We kept saying we’ve got to write a book because we want people to know him. She wasn’t intimidated, but she also didn’t look down on people. Q: How did she develop her blend of resilience and generosity? Her message was: Do it another way, demonstrate another way. She didn’t want us to get involved because we could get hurt and because, as she told me, if you want to work at NASA, you can’t have a record. Her attitude was “Oh, well, if I can’t do it this way, I’ll do it that way.” I was in college during a time where you had lunch-counter demonstrations. But she’d figure out how she could get what she wanted in spite of it. She would not ignore them, and she didn’t cower. The barriers she had, the hiccups and trauma that she lived through the course of her entire life? She just seemed never to let them bother her. Q: How did she deal with obstacles like racism and sexism? The Monitor spoke with one of her daughters, Joylette Goble Hylick, about her late mother’s outlook – and how she finally got to space. NASA mathematician Katherine Johnson’s memoir offers a glimpse into how she found success amid the racism and sexism of her era. And especially because they knew we were in a race against the Russians in the early years of the space program. They did it because they could, because it was challenging, because they felt they were representing our community. She’d say, “I was just doing my job, and I don’t know what all this is about.” Those ladies didn’t do their work to get famous. Q: What did your mother think when she became famous? Johnson, a centenarian who died in 2020, wrote about her life for the new memoir “My Remarkable Journey,” with help from her two daughters, Joylette Goble Hylick and Katherine Moore. Research scientist Katherine Johnson, whose calculations were critical to major missions, became a hero to millions. Will consumers be mindful about the relative impact of different EV vehicle options?įive years ago, a bestselling book and then an acclaimed film introduced the world to the “Hidden Figures,” a group of Black female mathematicians who played crucial roles at NASA during the Cold War space race. If you size up CO2 emissions over a vehicle’s lifetime, electricity soundly beats internal combustion – especially as more power is renewably sourced and battery technology gets “cleaner.”High gasoline prices turn heads toward EVs, which can lead to a hunt for affordable EV models. (The EV “high end” keeps getting higher.)The EV story, analysts point out, remains one of net carbon impact. An editorial in the Los Angeles Times decries a wave of bigger – and bigger-battery – EVs. Those are pricier than EVs like the little Bolt hatchback, which General Motors discontinued in favor of pickups. They’re more resource-intensive, too. ![]() The demand side – that is, consumer preferences – plays an important role, too.There are full-size EV pickups that can power homes, and some drivers do need big vehicles. For 2022, the firms involved in the mining and manufacturing for those accounted for 27% of Tesla’s total emissions, reports Quartz.But the supply side isn’t the only thing to consider as we think about EVs and making the future work. And such “Scope 3” emissions – including those of suppliers – represented the deepest part of the product line’s carbon footprint.Batteries are a big factor. But this time, in Tesla’s report, it was part of the tally. What should we make of a recent report from carmaker Tesla reminding us that, even though its cars have no tailpipes, there are significant carbon emissions associated with getting them built and on the road?It’s worth thinking about, though there’s a lot more at play when it comes to electric vehicles and CO2 emissions.The vast network needed to supply raw materials and component parts for EVs makes for difficult accounting.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |